politicized judiciary You always hear about politicized judiciary, but what is politicized judiciary?
The politicized judiciary is a phenomenon typical of the right for two reasons.
1) The "right" with the entry into politics of Silvio Berlusconi, and then entered the game with the media dominance of the industrialist, has slowly ushered in the homes of many Italians many common places, many "slogan "many" jingles "that influenced the Italian population quickly dextrose, which previously belonged to the DC but not only. One of these "sayings," best known and exploited in this period was called "politicized judiciary."
According to Berlusconi, the judiciary is to the left (the so-called "red robes"), since, according to him, is persecuted for years by this "caste of judges" communist
(1) .
Maybe there's a detail that escapes our current premier, who commits a crime is punishable under Italian law, who commit many crimes can be prosecuted several times by Italian law. If you no longer wants to be "persecuted" to stop committing crimes
(2) .
The judiciary then, thanks to massive media bombardment that affected the Italian population by the direct business Berlusconi and indirect (various newspapers and publishers, Mediaset, Rai),
imagery has become a right-handed machine communist persecution to be killed as soon as possible.
machine, it needs to do its job, namely to stop the criminals.
2) The most recent aspects you notice that there is actually
judiciary "politicized"
, but it's not like we have been taught that "community" of Berlusconi's doc, but that is part of an independent judiciary (the largest), the party believes the following (bad) Italian law, without being influenced by anyone, sometimes committing errors of human judgments as happens in rare cases worldwide. The judiciary is politicized, it proved that Berlusconi controlled by friends, old friends and new friends
P2 P3 of
. These judges dextroses (rather than dextrose, it would be better to say corrupt, but as P2 and P3 which are part of a phenomenon are right, we might as well call them that), they were able to influence or near a number of decisions at various levels from decisions of the CSM
(3)
( Superior Council of Magistracy
), decisions of the Constitutional Court , up to a few decisions in the process.
demonstrated that the judiciary is politicized and there is not the left.
Is there anyway to make a clarification, the politicized judiciary also exists to the left of course. It 's the very recent case of the CSM, in which 1 / 3 of judges who will be part of it shall be chosen by MPs. These judges are called magistrates "secular" as it should have no relation with politics, but should only be chosen on the basis of skill and morale elevatura.
I lay magistrates to choose from are 8, 5 and 3 by the majority opposition, and as mentioned above should be independent by the parties. However, in recent years, there are people who choose to continue within the party, which often are parliamentarians. In this way, the policy also enters in the judiciary, which should be independent. But the fact remains that the judiciary is politicized right-wing, and only a small part of the left, which is not me that has done damage. The rest of the judges who intentionally do stupid things are just corrupt, it would sell to anyone, no matter which side they are. But luckily there are a small part. (1) After careful analysis (actually not too deep) character of Berlusconi, is quickly comes to understand that the term "communist" refers to one who makes opposition to his will, chiunqe not run without ifs or buts its will is accused of communism. In reality we know that the Communists are a minority of the Italian population. Among other things Berlusconi uses the meaning "communist" referring to the unfortunate decline of the Stalinist dictatorship, then do not consider the phenomenon of communism in the right and complete sense. Also, the word "communist" is one of several "slogan" of the entrepreneur, now entered the basic vocabulary of common Berlusconi, with whom we are referring to a person who is not of the same idea, as explained just above.
(2) If Berlusconi had not entered politics would probably not so much persecuted, and even overly rich, because:
- would be in jail for quite some time, in fact in all its processes post '94 (including current) is his paw in the Italian law, the laws ad personam and Castamir, made specifically for the process to him and his friends. These laws have ruined the Italian legal system. - would not the media empire that has now, as a result of different end avbrebbero that had its processes, some of which concern and relate to the fact its properties and businesses.
(3) To give an example of decisions involving the CSM or the Constitutional Court or legal processes, we can mention:
- managed by the placement of some of the CSM Alfonso Marra as president of the Court of Appeal of Milan, placements and other similar figures of other "friends" of piduisti-pitreisti . - the attempt (thankfully failed) to influence the Constitutional Court on the decision concerning the constitutionality of the Lodo Alfano
- A magistrate judge who took care of the deal as Mondadori,
blatantly favoring the Knight
, is
Maria Rosaria
Grossi, which has been suspended from the direction of the Bankruptcy Court of Milan
charges of bribery and inducement to corruption
. This court also gave the land of a bankrupt company that makes the Sardinian Berlusconi at the head and then he could annex the property adjacent to Villa Certosa. The same court in 2005 piloted the transfer of the bankrupt Radio 105 at Mondadori. And the judges are asking how he could buy the
eight properties in downtown Milan
mysteriously appeared in his property.